Production-grade
infrastructure without
the DevOps hire
CloudBooster governs every infrastructure change on AWS. Built for lean teams shipping without a dedicated platform org.
How does the Platform keep every infrastructure change on one governed path?
On the hosted Platform, every change runs the same path: proposed, checked, approved, applied, and recorded, with evidence at each gate.
How does the Platform move a proposed change to production without skipping checks?
On the hosted Platform you describe the outcome, CloudBooster plans it, runs checks, routes approval, you apply in your account under control, and evidence is stored.
Before the governed lifecycle
When you are ready for propose → check → approve → apply in your cloud account, the Platform gives you a governed path with checks, approvals, and evidence.
Propose
Describe the change you want; the platform turns intent into a plan and the underlying Terraform or CloudFormation.
Check
Validate security, cost, and conflicts on the real change before it reaches production.
Approve
Explicit human or policy sign-off; approvers see checks, the plan, and who proposed it.
Apply
Controlled execution in your account; the run stops on unsafe or unexpected states.
Verify
Record what changed, confirm outcome, and watch drift against what was approved.
Monitor
Watch drift, health, and regressions after the change so issues surface while still small.
Every change that moves through this lifecycle becomes a ChangeSet: the atomic unit of governed infrastructure change in CloudBooster.
How it runs in your account
CloudBooster's control plane orchestrates the lifecycle and governance, while your AWS account runs the infrastructure workload under your ownership.
How does pricing work as your team and Platform usage grow?
The plans below are for the hosted Platform when you deploy and govern at scale in your account.
Start with a Platform pilot or early team rollout for new infrastructure on AWS. Expand usage as more infrastructure changes flow through CloudBooster.
Free
Explore the full platform. One project, one environment.
- •1 project, 1 environment
- •Full AI assistant (30 sessions/mo)
- •Full infrastructure catalog & composition
- •Preview → approve → deploy
- •3 security checks included
Starter
Ship real infrastructure with your team.
- •2 projects, 2 environments
- •5 team members
- •3 connected cloud accounts
- •50 deployments/mo
- •5 security checks + remediation
- •Manual drift detection
- •Email support
Growth
Production-grade governance for growing teams.
- •5 projects, 5 environments
- •20 team members
- •Separate approver required
- •Unlimited deployments
- •All checks + drift detection
- •Configurable deployment policies
- •Email + support cases
Premium
Enterprise scale, compliance & dedicated support.
- •Unlimited projects & environments
- •Unlimited team members
- •Separation of duties (SoD)
- •Full audit trail + SIEM export
- •Scheduled scans + auto-remediation
- •Enterprise SSO
- •Priority + dedicated support
You still pay your cloud provider(s) directly.
What goes wrong if we ship infrastructure changes from AI or scripts without a gate?
Creating change is fast now, especially with AI. The hard part is safe shipping: checks, approvers, and a record of what ran. Without that path, teams land in one of the four modes below.
Editors can also invent AWS shapes that look plausible: wrong SKUs, stale APIs, or policies that do not match your account. Governed ChangeSets on the Platform keep production changes grounded.
These are the failure patterns we see most often:
CTO as bottleneck
The CTO or founder still owns every infra change, slowing product work.
Unsafe AI-generated changes
AI ships infra with no one checking blast radius, cost, or security.
Too early for a DevOps hire
You are too small to hire DevOps, too big for ad-hoc scripts.
Consultant dependency
You need a consultant for every change; knowledge never stays in-house.
Is CloudBooster a good fit for our stage and how we use AWS?
We built for startups and lean teams on new or growing AWS work where a founder or engineer still owns cloud: no platform org yet, no spare DevOps hire.
- ↗Developers building and operating AWS infrastructure with governance needs
- ↗Building new infrastructure on AWS (Platform)
- ↗Lean engineering team without a dedicated DevOps / platform team
- ↗Want safer infrastructure changes without adding headcount
- ↗Already feeling the pain of ad-hoc infra ownership
- ↗Want a governed process from day one
- →Import of existing infrastructure
- →Broader coverage of existing AWS estates
- →More cloud providers
- –Multi-cloud-first enterprises
- –Large organizations with mature internal platform teams
- –Teams looking only for a Terraform runner
- –Teams expecting a hosting platform / PaaS
Questions engineering teams ask before adopting CloudBooster
Want to try a governed infrastructure path on AWS before you hire a platform team?
CloudBooster gives lean teams a governed path for creating infrastructure on AWS without needing to build a DevOps function first. We're opening a limited number of early pilot slots.
What can we run with CloudBooster today, and what is on the roadmap?
Implementation today is AWS-first: new infrastructure with guided onboarding and the governed lifecycle (propose, check, approve, apply, and record). Importing existing infrastructure and additional cloud providers are on the roadmap.

